Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

Outsourcing: How to Reduce Cost Without Compromising on Growth?


In a firm, several departments encounter outsourcing, including marketing, human resource, finance, IT and even the inventory stores. In order to generate a considerable sum of monetary income, a business has to manage multiple inventories apart from the accounts, bills, and expansion projects.

For consistency, the department's functions have to be efficient and diligent. A wise entrepreneur is someone who, against all odds, holds the position of making boldly base decisions with a focus on how to curtail cost and execute tasks on time apart from assuring customer satisfaction and, thus, loyalty. The absence of proper planning over the administration shifts and dilutes the focus from core business goals.

In most cases, companies outsource tasks they are not fully competent at, like IT. Others will focus on the key business tasks whilst they outsource all the other tasks. It is equivalent to subcontracting a failing sector with the goal to improve it.

The current argument regarding outsourcing pivots around cost reduction, which is the main driver. There are many downsides to outsourcing, which have to be taken into account by analysts before decision making. These comprise staff proceeds; it is only rational that a company has the ability to cater for the employees at the department under question.

The company is socially responsible for any laying-off. A huge obstacle for the analyst is the risk involved in reduced power over the central office store. The analyst also has to have a good analysis of the profits made by the companies to be outsourced. Taking into account the propositions, the companies hold a broad advantage of pricing as a result of mass buying. Also, the catalogues imply over quotations, which means higher margins in profit.

Most of the setbacks linked to outsourcing do not provide sufficient reason to avoid it. People want access to specialized skills to ensure adequate and timely product delivery. Other good reasons (not limited) comprise better workflow, better business transactions or processes, flexibility in staff allocation, business continuity and the ability to focus on critical sectors of the business etc. The expert has to concentrate on the key reasons for taking into consideration outsourcing over in-house management.

Taking the example of Futronics Inc, which is facing business threats from competitors, outsourcing's primary goal is bound to be cost reduction without sacrificing growth. Replacing the organisation's central store operations with service delivery and huge inventory is taking a massive chance over control but significantly minimises expenditure. (Kahn, 2009) The company can bounce back to its strong basis and compete with the Competitors back to the status quo.

The vision is extremely compromised but compared to the result of the firm's status provides, this is a more suitable option. The expense of Having in-house employees is comparatively higher than subcontracting. Also, managing fewer inventories is more expensive and inferior.

The third-party providers have exceptional skill, knowledge, and experience on how to handle the proceedings and, in this instance, how to keep the company on the competitive edge. Potentially, the central store employees are just as competent, but in the absence of proper supplies, they are unable to sustain the firm’s endeavours.

As per Kahn (2009), outsourcing is a given for the firm's quality and profitability, specifically when the tendered team is adequately competent and has a good reputation in the field. Since the business is at stake, accuracy, efficiency, and quality assured by an outsourced panel would deliver the service required to revive the company and also save its reputation. (Greene, 2009).

Taking into account the analysis conducted, the items would be obtainable at a lower price while providing the company with a primary saving of around 6 percent. The outsourcing team provides the business with an opportunity to access specialized skills along with a broad spectrum of products due to its nature of expertise and higher investments.

If retaining the current employees at the central store will also get a chance to acquire the skillset and advancements to beat future competitors. These skills allow the business to grab and capitalize on the niche market. The company will also get the opportunity to get access to skills for substituting other operations fields apart from the inventory store.

About Author:

Prakhar Panchbhaiya

Senior Content Writer at Procurement Resource

Prakhar Panchbhaiya is an accomplished content writer and market research analyst. With over 4 years of experience in content creation and market analysis encompassing many industries, including pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, biochemistry, healthcare, ed-tech, and Food & Agriculture, he has been creating quality content for multiple sectors. He is a Biochemistry major with sturdy backing in a PG diploma in digital marketing, helping in the exhaustive content creation based on extensive research and competitive marketing.




Get latest News About Procurement Resource
Subscribe for news

This site uses cookies (including third-party cookies) to record user’s preferences which help us to enhance our services. For further information review our Privacy Policy